By Barbara M. Yarnold
In this research of federal lawsuits depending upon the landmark Roe v. Wade choice, the writer unearths that the pro-life stream within the usa has suffered repeated losses in abortion litigation. also, her examine shows that, regardless of claims on the contrary, the pro-life stream is a unfastened number of underfunded and understaffed public curiosity firms. The pro-choice forces are significantly extra robust in abortion litigation, have better association and financing, and comprise not just public curiosity teams but additionally deepest pursuits similar to clinics clinical corporations. Divided into 3 elements, the learn starts with a public legislation research of the progeny of Roe instances, reading these variables which seem to influence courtroom judgements. subsequent the paintings examines political elements and litigation assets as variables in explaining court docket judgements. and at last, the paintings deals a descriptive research of abortion litigants which divides the teams into significant different types and evaluates them when it comes to their assets, sturdiness, and different such components. This booklet can be of curiosity to these heavily attracted to the political and felony ramifications of the abortion controversy.
Read or Download Abortion Politics in the Federal Courts. Right Versus Right PDF
Best rules & procedures books
This ebook explains the mechanics of a civil lawsuit in phrases that any legislation individual can comprehend.
First released in 1969. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa corporation.
- The Reform of Class and Representative Actions in European Legal Systems: A New Framework for Collective Redress in Europe (Studies of the Oxford Institute of European and Comparative Law)
- Regulation through Litigation
- Origins of the Federal Judiciary: Essays on the Judiciary Act of 1789
- Elements of Contract Interpretation
Extra info for Abortion Politics in the Federal Courts. Right Versus Right
What types of activities (or resources) make a group politically powerful? On a practical level, is it possible to obtain information about the political activities of groups; is it likely, for example, that they will divulge such information in response to a survey? In spite of these obstacles, the challenge here is to devise, employing for this purpose an appropriate set of federal court cases, adequate measures of whether a group is a repeat player, the litigation resources of interest groups, and the political clout of groups that are involved in federal court cases.
Groups lobby on many issues aside from judicial appointments, so another component of the "politic" variable is whether the group testifies before Congress and, if so, how often? And since group lobbying also extends to bureaucracy (Baum 1989, 1990; Yarnold 1988, 1990b; Berman 1988; Bryner 1987; Rosenbloom 1989), a fourth part of the "politic" measure examines whether the group meets with agencies with regard to proposed rules and regulations. If political pressures count, then a group that is highly involved in the political process (and is labeled here as "politic") should have more favorable judicial outcomes than groups with a low measurement on this variable.
Other groups specifically dedicated to the protection of women's rights were also quite active in these cases, such as NOW. Associations of health-care providers also were involved, aware by now of the enormous risks illegal abortions pose to women and of their own increasing financial stake in the provision of abortions; many local abortion clinics and groups of health-care providers became advocates of women in these cases, as well as more powerful national organizations, including Planned Parenthood, the National Medical Association, the National Association of Social Workers, and the American Public Health Association.
Abortion Politics in the Federal Courts. Right Versus Right by Barbara M. Yarnold